One of our readers sent me this article, it looks like the swimsuit controversy has reached The Wall Street Journal where Matthew Futterman provides his overall summary of the past few months of deliberation and drama.
The article provides a lot of anecdotes and quotes from coaches facing budget problems while trying to find ways to first locate, and then pay for the newest technology in swimwear.
Two interesting facts from the article are Futterman’s report of the total life of the LZR Racer suit, and some additional background about the suit production and cost. Futterman reports that the suit will last 30 hours if properly cared for, which is new information to me because I’ve always heard the suits last anywhere from 7 to 10 swims. Secondly here’s an excerpt from the article, about the production of the suits, that I found interesting:
Craig Brommers, director of marketing for Speedo in North America, said the company’s factory in Portugal can now produce some 80,000 LZRs annually but was unprepared for the massive demand after 91% of gold medalists in Beijing wore the suit. “There were some shortfalls,” said Mr. Brommers. He explained that the high cost reflects the years of research and development Speedo dedicated to the LZR.
An informative and well-written piece–however… In a section titled “Flabby and Lazy,” Futterman writes:
Most troubling to coaches, the suits seem to help the flabby, lazier swimmers the most, because their fat gets compressed but remains more buoyant than dense muscle, allowing them to float higher in the water and swim faster.
While I agree with the physics behind this statement, I don’t agree with how this is ‘most troubling’ to coaches. And which coaches? Is this saying that coaches are torn between training their athletes and fattening them up? Is this saying that “lazy” college swimmers have breakthrough swims much to their coach’s chagrin? Is there such a thing as a lazy college swimmer with respect to the rest of the swimming community?
I’m not trying to bash the Wall Street Journal article too much, because its intended audience is surely non-swimmer business-minded types looking for Michael Phelps name-drops, I just wanted to express my confusion and concern over the “Flabby and Lazy” section.